Huh? I’m scratching my head at Google’s new
AdWords policy that attempts to ban affiliate arbitrage bidding, since one
could drive a Mack truck through the loophole left open.
Affiliate arbitrage is when an affiliate buys key words on Google and links
the ad directly to a merchant’s site. The affiliate commissions add up to be
more than the affiliate ad buys on Google cost. As a result, the affiliate earns
a profit.
Because of affiliate arbitragers, at times, Google's paid search listings
have been overwhelmed with ads for one merchant. Some merchants like the fact
that all paid links on Google lead to their site and push the competition off
the page. Also, merchants like having an army of affiliates optimizing their
paid search terms on a commission basis. And in fact, a band of smart affiliates
working on a commission basis might out perform two paid search marketers that
work for a merchant -- for example, an eBay marketing director said last August
at Search Engine Strategies
that eBay couldn't not accomplish with their in-house search team what their
affiliates do for them in the search engine management space.
Google’s new policy attempts to limit this type of arbitrage. However, there
is rather huge loophole in the language. Here is the wording:
“With this new affiliate policy, we'll only display one ad per search
query for affiliates and parent companies sharing the same URL. This way,
users will have a more diverse sampling of advertisements to choose from.”
URL is the key word. What is to stop merchants from making unique URLs
for each affiliate?
Here is an example:
www.merchant.com/index1.htm
www.merchant.com/index2.htm
www.merchant.com/index3.htm
www.merchant.com/index4.htm
Moreover, Commission Junction has a unique URL for each affiliate link since
the URL includes the affiliate ID (PID) and the merchant ID (AID)
Here is an example:
http://www.merchant.com/?AID=12345678&PID=12345678
LinkShare uses a similar syntax in which variables change to create a unique
URL for each affiliate link to a specific merchant.
Now think about the wording of the new policy. It does seem pretty
useless.
The rumor circulating tonight is that Google made a mistake and meant to
write domain, not URL.
Whether Google did or not, I think this policy, as worded, will prove to be
useless. I would guess more changes are coming.
Assuming Google meant domain and not URL, Google does appear to have left the
rest of affiliate advertising on the search engine alone. Google seems to be
trying to bring themselves (almost) in line with where Overture has been since
the industry developed by insisting that the advertiser owns the domain.
Affiliate advertising adds significant value to merchants. As Google
challenges merchants to develop new policies on affiliate advertising, I hope
that merchants remember not to throw the baby out with the bathwater by
eliminating all affiliate advertising.
This will all be very interesting to watch as it plays out.